What was the mark of the beast? The Bible describes the mark of the beast for us:
1) It was visible - it was a "mark";
2) It was the beast's name - not the bearer's name - but the beast's name; or
3) It was the beast's number - not the individual bearer's own number - but the beast's number.
That doesn't sound like a microchip - not in appearance, nor in function.
But the Bible's description is only an allegory which required interpretation. Any interpretive model - such as the microchip theory - is therefore just that - an interpretive model. It's not necessarily black-and-white Bible truth.
No comments:
Post a Comment